Software Testing and QA Services
Bugs in production cost more than bugs in sprint in terms of engineering time, customer trust, and the release you had to roll back. We provide the QA layer most teams don't have the headcount to build: manual testers, automation engineers, and the coverage to tell you what actually works before your users do.
Our Software Testing Services
Functional Testing
Test Automation
Performance & Load Testing
Security Testing
Mobile App Testing
UI & Usability Testing
API Testing
Compatibility & Regression Testing
AI-Powered Testing
Testing AI Features and Non-Deterministic Systems
Evaluation Sets Instead of Assertions
Instead of pass/fail checks, a curated set of real user questions with agreed acceptable answers is scored on every release. You get a quality score that moves, showing whether your AI is improving.
Retrieval Accuracy Testing
For RAG systems, we measure whether the right source passages are retrieved before anything reaches the model. Most “the AI gave a bad answer” problems are really retrieval problems in disguise.
Hallucination and Grounding Checks
Every response is checked against the retrieved sources to confirm it is grounded in evidence. When information is missing, the system should decline to answer rather than invent one, and our tests confirm it does.
Agent Behaviour and Tool-Use Testing
Agentic systems need testing on the unhappy paths. What happens when a tool call fails, an API times out, the agent gets stuck in a loop, or it attempts an action outside its permitted scope?
Prompt and Model Regression Testing
Prompt edits and model upgrades can change behavior silently. Running the evaluation set against every change catches quality drift before release, so issues are found by your QA team, not reported by users.
AI Safety and Adversarial Testing
AI systems face risks traditional software never did. Adversarial testing probes for prompt injection, jailbreak attempts, data leakage, and biased outputs, so your AI behaves safely and responsibly even when users try to misuse it.
Benefits of Our QA & Testing Services
Faster Time to Market
Lower Cost of Defects
Fewer Production Issues
Better User Experience
Stronger Security & Compliance
Data-Driven Release Decisions
Our QA & Testing Process
Quality is built in from the first requirement. Our structured QA process runs alongside your development cycle, so issues are caught early and every release goes out tested, measured, and ready.
Industry-Focused QA & Testing Services
Technical Expertise
Why Choose TOPS for QA & Testing Services?
Client Testimonial
Real Words, Real Success
Frequently Asked Questions
Is your question not here? No Problem, We're waiting for you with more answers! Do not hesitate to contact us if your inquiry was not included in the list.
Typically manual functional and regression testing, test automation, API testing, performance and load testing, security testing, and accessibility audits. What a given engagement includes depends on your product’s risk profile — a payments platform and a content site need very different coverage.
Cost is driven by scope and model rather than a per-test rate. A dedicated QA engineer is a predictable monthly cost; a project-based engagement is priced on scope; a QA audit is a fixed short engagement. The variables that move the number are the number of platforms, how much automation exists already, and whether regression runs every sprint or every quarter.
Both, in different places. Automate stable paths that run frequently — regression, smoke, API contracts. Keep humans on exploratory testing, usability, and anything changing week to week. Teams that automate everything end up maintaining a suite that fails for the wrong reasons; teams that automate nothing spend every release re-running the same checks by hand.
It depends on release cadence and surface area far more than on team size. A common starting point is one QA engineer per three to five developers for a product with continuous releases, but a QA audit will give you a defensible answer for your situation rather than a ratio from an article.
Yes. We work in your Jira, your CI pipeline and your test management system rather than asking you to adopt ours. If you have an automation framework already, we’d generally rather repair and extend it than replace something your team knows.
With evaluation sets rather than fixed assertions: a curated set of real inputs with agreed acceptable outputs, scored on every release. For retrieval-based systems we also measure whether the correct sources are being retrieved, since most poor answers are retrieval failures rather than model failures.
A short assessment of your current coverage, defect history, release process and automation state, producing a prioritised list of gaps ranked by risk. It’s the lowest-commitment way to find out what you actually need before committing to an ongoing engagement.
Yes — WCAG 2.2 Level AA audits covering screen reader behaviour, keyboard navigation, contrast and focus management. Automated scanners catch roughly a third of accessibility issues, so manual testing with assistive technology is a necessary part of it.
Latest Insights
View All
How to Choose a React JS Development Company

How Much Does It Cost to Hire MEAN Stack Developers in 2027?




